|
A Subordinating Conjunction (sometimes called a dependent word or subordinator) comes at the beginning of a Subordinate (or Dependent) Clause and establishes the relationship between the dependent clause and the rest of the sentence. It also turns the clause into something that depends on the rest of the sentence for its meaning.
[li]He took to the stage as though he had been preparing for this moment all his life. [/li][li]Because he loved acting, he refused to give up his dream of being in the movies. [/li][li]Unless we act now, all is lost. [/li] Notice that some of the subordinating conjunctions in the table below — after, before, since — are also prepositions, but as subordinators they are being used to introduce a clause and to subordinate the following clause to the independent element in the sentence.
Common Subordinating Conjunctions
| after
although
as
as if
as long as
as though
because
before
even if
even though
| if
if only
in order that
now that
once
rather than
since
so that
than
that
| though
till
unless
until
when
whenever
where
whereas
wherever
while
|
The Case of Like and As
| Strictly speaking, the word like is a preposition, not a conjunction. It can, therefore, be used to introduce a prepositional phrase (\"My brother is tall like my father\"), but it should not be used to introduce a clause (\"My brother can't play the piano [strike]like[/strike] as he did before the accident\" or \"It looks [strike]like[/strike] as if basketball is quickly overtaking baseball as America's national sport.\"). To introduce a clause, it's a good idea to use as, as though, or as if, instead.
[li][strike]Like[/strike] As I told you earlier, the lecture has been postponed. [/li][li]It looks [strike]like[/strike] as if it's going to snow this afternoon. [/li][li]Johnson kept looking out the window [strike]like[/strike] as though he had someone waiting for him.[/li] In formal, academic text, it's a good idea to reserve the use of like for situations in which similarities are being pointed out:
[li]This community college is like a two-year liberal arts college.[/li] However, when you are listing things that have similarities, such as is probably more suitable:
[li]The college has several highly regarded neighbors, [strike]like[/strike] such as the Mark Twain House, St. Francis Hospital, the Connecticut Historical Society, and the UConn Law School.[/li] |
Omitting That
| The word that is used as a conjunction to connect a subordinate clause to a preceding verb. In this construction that is sometimes called the \"expletive that.\" Indeed, the word is often omitted to good effect, but the very fact of easy omission causes some editors to take out the red pen and strike out the conjunction that wherever it appears. In the following sentences, we can happily omit the that (or keep it, depending on how the sentence sounds to us):
[li]Isabel knew [that] she was about to be fired. [/li][li]She definitely felt [that] her fellow employees hadn't supported her. [/li][li]I hope [that] she doesn't blame me. [/li] Sometimes omitting the that creates a break in the flow of a sentence, a break that can be adequately bridged with the use of a comma:
[li]The problem is, [strike]that[/strike] production in her department has dropped. [/li][li]Remember, [strike]that[/strike] we didn't have these problems before she started working here.[/li] As a general rule, if the sentence feels just as good without the that, if no ambiguity results from its omission, if the sentence is more efficient or elegant without it, then we can safely omit the that. Theodore Bernstein lists three conditions in which we should maintain the conjunction that:
[li]When a time element intervenes between the verb and the clause: \"The boss said yesterday that production in this department was down fifty percent.\" (Notice the position of \"yesterday.\") [/li][li]When the verb of the clause is long delayed: \"Our annual report revealed that some losses sustained by this department in the third quarter of last year were worse than previously thought.\" (Notice the distance between the subject \"losses\" and its verb, \"were.\") [/li][li]When a second that can clear up who said or did what: \"The CEO said that Isabel's department was slacking off and that production dropped precipitously in the fourth quarter.\" (Did the CEO say that production dropped or was the drop a result of what he said about Isabel's department? The second that makes the sentence clear.) [/li] Authority for this section: Dos, Don'ts & Maybes of English Usage by Theodore Bernstein. Gramercy Books: New York. 1999. p. 217. Examples our own.
|
Beginning a Sentence with Because
| Somehow, the notion that one should not begin a sentence with the subordinating conjunction because retains a mysterious grip on people's sense of writing proprieties. This might come about because a sentence that begins with because could well end up a fragment if one is not careful to follow up the \"because clause\" with an independent clause.
[li]Because e-mail now plays such a huge role in our communications industry.[/li] When the \"because clause\" is properly subordinated to another idea (regardless of the position of the clause in the sentence), there is absolutely nothing wrong with it:
[li]Because e-mail now plays such a huge role in our communications industry, the postal service would very much like to see it taxed in some manner.[/li] |
|
|