Mammogram accuracy varies by radiologist: study

oops1

http://www.canada.com/topics/bod ... 50c8128&k=72881


A woman receives a mammogram in an undated image. Women with lumps in their breasts rely on their radiologists to accurately read their mammograms, but the accuracy of those readings varies widely, U.S. researchers on Tuesday. REUTERS/RSNA/Handout



Mammogram accuracy varies by radiologist: study
Julie Steenhuysen , Reuters
Published: Tuesday, December 11, 2007
CHICAGO (Reuters) - Women with lumps in their breasts rely on their radiologists to accurately read their mammograms, but the accuracy of those readings varies widely, U.S. researchers on Tuesday.

Earlier studies found variation in the quality of screening mammograms. But the new research found inconsistencies even when a lump was present, leaving some women open to false positive results or even missed diagnoses, said Diana Miglioretti, a researcher at the Group Health Center for Health Studies in Seattle, whose study was published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

Miglioretti and her team evaluated 123 radiologists who looked at 36,000 diagnostic mammograms from 1996 through 2003 at 72 U.S. facilities, including six from Group Health, a nonprofit health maintenance organization in Washington.

They found that sensitivity -- the ability to accurately detect cancer -- ranged from 27 percent to 100 percent. False positives ranged from 0 to 16 percent.

\"On average, 21 percent of breast cancers were missed and 4.3 percent of women underwent a biopsy even though they didn't have breast cancer,\" Miglioretti said in a telephone interview.

This variability was evident even after accounting for differences in physical characteristics.

Miglioretti said the results surprised her.

\"I was expecting diagnostic mammograms to be less variable than screening mammograms,\" Miglioretti said. Diagnostic mammograms are those performed on women whose initial, screening mammograms led to breast concerns.

The study included data from rural hospitals, where radiologists may not handle a high volume of diagnostic mammograms.

Miglioretti said women might want to consider scheduling diagnostic exams at centers with breast imaging experts. \"It might be worth driving the extra hour to find one. It is not always possible,\" she said.

The study was funded by grants from the National Cancer Institute, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

There will be an estimated 178,000 new cases of breast cancer in the United States this year, with 40,000 deaths.

(Editing by Patricia Zengerle)