|
发表于 2006-6-10 21:16:02
|
显示全部楼层
I want to say that China didn't defeat U.S.A and its allies, because of the reason for the reality that there are two countries there, Korea and South Korea. The suitable expression should be: it was a compromise between the two sides. Therefore, there was no winner in that war. We can say we were winner because we were poor and the weapon was poor, and the U.S.A was loser, because it didn't defeat us. But that doesn't mean U.S.A was a loser, because China didn't chase U.S.A out of Korea acturally. There is not necessary to stress the win in order to strengthen ours confidence.
Korea war shew the value what should human chose avoiding the more destruction, especially when the states involed in the war were for the interests instead of prevent their interests from being taken away. It was the process for adding the interests, not for losing the interests. Therefore, there must be a balance point there, and the endurable adventure scope for them. The result of Korea war just reflected that it was acceptable for both sides, and any futher war will hurt the interests of both sides.
We cannot say that China fear U.S.A, or U.S.A, it worth nothing to boast or fear. It is clear that the balance point of the interests is the key for the conflict between China and U.S.A. When we talk about interests, it would be understand why China bought so many American airplane, instead of the airbus from EU even though U.S restrain the high-tech export to China, it is the strategy for taking the american economy into China market and forms a inter-dependence. And U.S.A shows it flexiblity sometimes to China in order to keep the space for negotiation or compromise with China.
For the War, the neclear weapon may be only fatal threat to U.S.A, even though the amount of that can only destroy the earth one time, but that is enough, because we only have one globe. U.S.A pursue it value as well as its econormic interests, and sometimes, it mixes them together, therefere, it cannot pursuade China or others to believe what it says, because sometimes it seems a lie, even though it is true in the logic, but how can others believe the logic from the state who doesn't follow that logic? that shows the value conflicts face the difficulty on the logic and the reality.
There are many trouble between China and U.S.A, it is a process to understanding and to adjustmment. The good aspect is that the two countries can talk with each other frankly, which will help understand the real intention of each other, which will help to avoid the danger and the stand they hold. There would be no difference when the two countries who own the fatal weapon in hands on who can kill the whole nation or who can kill the half. when that happen, the chin reaction will happen and may destroy the whole world.
what I would say that really enemy is not from the earth, but from the nature. the flood, earthquake, the storm...... and the worsen climate. Human may understand in the end that they are really stupid when they find that there is no place suitable to live, and the fearness will be full of their heart, instead of the satisfaction of winning. |
|