|
发表于 2006-2-4 20:42:17
|
显示全部楼层
哼哼,俺先出手.
Since I was very young, I have always been against play fireworks during the Spring Festival. Part of the reason is that I am a person who likes quiet environment, and I like reading books and watching movies in leisure time very much. So it is very annoying for me to listen to the noise made by firework in the treasurable spare time of the Spring Festival. However, I also belive that banning firework is good for the public. In my opinion, there are three categories of reasons to justify people's activities: maximisation of utility, right to liberty, and tradtion. Here I will try to analyse one by one and to show that none of these reasons can be used to justify the playing of firework.
I believe it is quite clear that playing firework is not good for maximisation utility. The materials which are used to make firework can be used to make some other better and useful things. Moreover, playing firework is a relatively dangerous entertainment. I used to remember the TV and newspaper reports about those who were injured by firework. I am sure that a man who loses an eyes would be regret on playing firework. Some may claim that playing firework can make people happier and thus increases the total utility, but according to my experience of communicating with other people on internet forums, there are a lot of people who share the same feeling with me. The decreased utility of us should also be counted.
It can be argued that people should have the right to play firework, yet it is still very ambiguous to see what makes playing firework a right to liberty. J.S.Mill, in probably the most classical work about the problem of liberty, argues persuasively that people could and should have the right to liberty, but only when they do not harm the liberty of the others. Playing firework definitely harm the others by making non-stopping noises, so I do not see sufficient reason to protect such liberty.
Finally, tradition has been used in many cases to defend firework. To refute such defence, we should notice that, firstly, "something is old" or "something has a long history" is hardly a sufficient reasons to keep something unchanged. Secondly, a more utilitarian reason against firework is that, the government has already tried to ban it for some years, or more accurately, ALMOST a generation. Tradition is not just something written on books and remembered by people when they are young. Tradition is something alive, and it is embedded in people's daily lives. Therefore, if some tradition is considered as badand should be moved, working for one generation s important, because as the tradition becomes unfamiliar to the next generation, they will not be easily hard by the bad side of it any more. In the case of firework, we are now facing a situation that, within maybe several years, young people will not be exciting about it anymore, so that the moise are supposed to disappear even if the government does not ban it. Since the government has worked hard on that policy for years, I am really sorry to hear that they give up just few years to the final success. |
|