|
发表于 2005-12-31 18:15:53
|
显示全部楼层
why should human be kind or bad? when we see the younger tiger, we say he is cute, even though he kill others; however, when he kill human, we say he is bad. the concept about kind or bad is just defined by human. when the chirld is given to birth, he/she is just like the younger tiger, cute. where is the bad, or kind? he is just like the blank paper, natural without any awareness of kind or bad. there are two trends about human nature: westerners or christians think human nature is bad because of the thought of sin, mainly from religious aspect, Xun Zi, thought human nature is bad, because the reality that human's inclination to interests. however, why should interests be a bad? nowadays, is interests a bad thing? on the other hand, confucians thought human nature is good, but they didn't provide a persuasive explanation, seems just because of the compassionateness of human. why won't human have good and bad in the meantime? when we say some one is bad, is he originally bad? meaning of good or bad nature is not about the definition of itself, the key is its meanting to the society. when it says human nature is bad, it suggests the institution should build a system to limit the power in oder to prevent the abuse, and individual rights can be guaranteed as much as possible; on the contrary, the thought that human nature is bad, stresses more the self constraint, however, how if those who don't do self constraint? in that case, individual rights will be violated without sufficient protection. |
|