最厉害的一招就是碎尸万段~
多下点功夫，做出点属于自己的成绩多好。现在的评比制度也促使造假成风。
bookish兄确实是学识渊博，敬佩敬佩！
大家都非常痛恨剽窃了，在学术界剽窃如同盗窃，这是非常耻辱的事情；不知耻辱，何以谈学术研究？
中国人的抄袭是有传统的——想一想民国初年有无所有时的大量译介——也许就明白什么叫“借鉴式抄袭”了。
遇到过身边同学的硕士论文是根据研究生部资料室里四篇之前硕士生的毕业论文而制造出的。
这句话够长吧
呵呵
写什么论文啊，能赚钱就好
看楼上诸多回帖，实在不值一哂，现实之人之情，可见一斑。
惟有不会思考偏要装出思想者的深沉的淫，才类此嘴脸，或拾人牙慧或张冠李戴还抵死不认。说到底，不自知，人生境界也就如此，不过也没什么道德制高点可占，各人活各人的，这个社会装的人太多了，以至于“表演”是常态，外表光鲜，内中空虚者层出不穷。
不过说实话，现在的电子狗技术之类的，都只是很粗浅地辨识，对付那些作假能力尚浅的人尚可，窃国者要如何对付？
首先，文章都是学生写的，他自己署名第一作者。课题申请报告都要学生来打工。
其次，非常谨慎，比楼主所提更加狡猾，他选的领域都是那种可以胡说八道，一顿乱扯的，尤其偏好那种刚开辟出来的新学科和特别老的，本来用我们现代汉语就说不清楚的学科，因为可以拿新当挡箭牌，作为筚路蓝缕的开拓者开始时的问题可以被忽略，作为传统的继承者，他又只说一些古人都曾说过的话，论点半新不新，你都不知道他如何得出来的
再有，这种人的功力和根底不在于写东西，而在于老树盘根，打通各路学术人脉，他师从著名的XX学者，培育了许多学术后人（多数和他一样不学无术但特能混），桃李满天下，而且参与诸多学术利益的评定（什么委员会，编辑部），即使查出他咋地，你想扳倒他，没门。
这种人才是学术的大患毒瘤，树会因为这种人的繁殖被蛀空。
引用第2楼tjbnbnbn于2006-08-19 11:45发表的 :
还有一种情况是某一作者的同一研究工作分别发表在不同级别的杂志上，比如“中华牌”的发了，过一年又发在“某省医药”上，内容一模一样，这算不算不正当呢？
应该不算不正当。
有些也是巧合。因为发文章有延时。而且越是大的杂志社，其审查周期既严格也相对慢。在未得到采用回复前又投了低档次的杂志社。那么这些相对小的杂志社的刊登周期短，便有可能先行发表了。
人心浮燥，
安下心来做学问的人不会做的，但考核人员能力达标的各种指标在暗示着他/她，并且还是周期性的，过期就做废，这就使部分燥动的心涌动起来了，，，
抄袭是照搬不误，在某些地方多些。某些专业出版的书籍很集中，近几年如雨后春笋般拔地而起，，内容有多少创新或新东西？不敢苟同，，，，，，，，，而往往专业领域的领头人、开拓者也许他/她多是上了年纪？或大多没啥经济头脑？，，，，，，，，，也许因为\大概、差不多出书不赚钱，有能力的人都搞项目去了，，，，，，，，，，
俺承认，俺做了这样的事，也是不得已而为之，现在想想有点追悔未极，真是不应该啊
今天看到个“伦敦大学哲学学习指导”，第五部分专门谈到抄袭：贴英文原文如下（有举例）：
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/philosophy/LPSG/intro.htm#Plagiarism
5. Plagiarism
Any work guilty of plagiarism will lead to a failing grade on that paper, and likely disqualification by the University. To avoid this possibility please bear in mind when presubmitting work:
1. Direct quotations should be in quotation marks, with reference to the source, including page numbers.
2. Indirect/paraphrased quotations and borrowed ideas should be acknowledged by means of a reference.
3. A full bibliography of work consulted and used should be appended to the essay.
Below is attached an example of what is, and what is not, plagiarism, prepared by Richard Dennis of the Geography Department at UCL. If you are concerned about this in your own work, please discuss the matter with your tutor or Departmental Tutor.
AN EXAMPLE: OBSERVATIONS ON CLASS STRUGGLE
Richard Dennis
1. The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles. Society as a whole is more and more splitting up into two great hostile camps, into two great classes directly facing each other: Bourgeoisie and Proletariat. Masses of labourers, crowded into the factory, are organised like soldiers. Not only are they slaves of the bourgeois class, and of the bourgeois State; they are daily and hourly enslaved by the machine, by the overlooker, and, above all, by the individual bourgeois manufacturer himself. The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win.
THIS IS PLAGIARISM. THERE IS NO ATTEMPT TO INDICATE THAT THESE ARE NOT RICHARD DENNIS'S OWN THOUGHTS BUT ARE WORDS TAKEN DIRECT FROM DIFFERENT PARTS OF THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO.
2. Marx and Engels noted that the history of all hitherto existing society had been the history of class struggles. Society as a whole was more and more splitting up into two great hostile camps, into two great classes directly facing each other: Bourgeoisie and Proletariat. They observed that proletarians had nothing to lose but their chains. They had a world to win.
THIS IS STILL PLAGIARISM. ALTHOUGH THE IDEAS ARE ATTRIBUTED TO MARX AND ENGELS, THERE IS NO INDICATION THAT THE FORM OF WORDS IS NOT RICHARD DENNIS'S. JUST CHANGING IT INTO THE PAST TENSE DOESN'T MAKE IT ORIGINAL.
3. In The Communist Manifesto, Marx and Engels (1973 edn., p. 40) noted that 'The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles'. They argued that society was 'more and more splitting up into two great hostile camps, into two great classes directly facing each other: Bourgeoisie and Proletariat' (p. 41). 'Masses of labourers, crowded into the factory' were 'organised like soldiers ... slaves of the bourgeois class, and of the bourgeois State' (p. 52). They concluded that 'The proletarians have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win' (p. 96).
THIS IS NOT PLAGIARISM, BUT IF ALL YOUR ESSAY CONSISTS OF IS A SET OF QUOTATIONS STITCHED TOGETHER, IT DOESN'T SUGGEST THAT YOU HAVE THOUGHT ABOUT OR UNDERSTOOD THE CONTENTS OF THE QUOTATIONS. SO RICHARD DENNIS WOULDN'T EARN VERY MANY MARKS FROM ME FOR THIS EFFORT!
4. In one of the most famous first sentences ever written, Marx and Engels (1973 edn., p 40) began The Communist Manifesto thus: 'The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.' They went on to exemplify this claim by showing how the structure of society had, in their view, developed into two interdependent but antagonistic classes: bourgeoisie and proletariat. The latter comprised factory operatives, who had been reduced to no more than slave labour; but as they became concentrated geographically, in the great factory towns of the industrial revolution, so they had the opportunity to organise themselves politically. Hence, the authors' conclusion that a communist revolution was not only desirable, but possible, leading them to issue their equally famous final exhortation (p. 96): 'WORKING MEN OF ALL COUNTRIES, UNITE!'
THIS MAY NOT BE A VERY PROFOUND COMMENTARY, BUT AT LEAST I'VE TRIED!
最厉害的一招就是碎尸万段~
天下文章一般抄！！！！！！
前年写了一篇文章，投稿一家水准不错的期刊（季刊），不知其审稿周期一年。等了半年，没有任何回音。于是投给另一家比较普通的期刊，很快发了。结果再过了半年，先前的那家期刊电话通知说采用。不能一稿两用啊！只能回复说，已经发表了。亏大了啊！
受教育了。。。。。。。。。。。。
这种学术之怪现象，不仅仅存在于我国的学术界，而是潜规则与有中国特色社会主义之中国的行行业业；当然，我觉得，出现这种情况的根本原因，就是执政党的特色之说把中国的传统道德带偏了，国之本能，是提升国度中人的素质和精气神，而非提升国人的贪欲、浮躁和道德败坏；但稍微畅游网络，映入眼帘的无不是执政官员的贪腐、生活堕落和基本道德的败坏；试想，如果执政的官员素质如此，那深受其掌控的高校，在各级各部门大大小小的官员以检查、视察、关心的名义前去高校，高校能独自洁身只好吗？
我所认识的一个博士后，帮我硕士的导师做了个子课题，写了一篇滑坡的论文，后来他把我导师的名字挂成第1作者，他列第2，不仅赢得了我导师数万元的科研经费，而且还得到导师赏识，报奖将其列为第二完成人，然而让人啼笑皆非的是，论文刊登后，被EI检索，大连一家知名高校的知名教授对论文中的内容提出了抄袭的质疑，要求我导师公开对论文中的雷同之处进行解释，我导师才恍然大悟，但悔之晚矣。
现如今，那位博士后不仅没有得到惩罚，而且还借助于那个项目，顺利破格教授并一举拿下博导的头衔，真是悲催啊！试想他都那样，以后他带的博士，硕士会如何呢？
有些习惯了，好多论文都是拼凑上的，没办法
抄袭的目的都是为了提高发文数量
花了四年，写了一篇文章，举证无数，推翻古往今来的一个定论，投几家期刊，无一认同。
已把名琴弹，恨无知音赏啊！
引用第72楼尚戚于2008-01-03 21:16发表的 :
有更离谱的。
某机械行业最权威的期刊07年度发表了15年前的一篇同名论文，不过作者改了。
这才到哪里，我发现过有的文章能被炒5遍，除了作者，其他一模一样。