文章被杂志录用了，很高兴

944f4fe875fb39d

最近接到编辑部通知，一篇论文被杂志录用了，十分高兴。

这篇论文我是05年起草的。五一长假期间定下心来，总结了自己前期的研究成果，先写了一篇论文投中国化工学报（英文版），感觉良好，便又写了一篇投C&CE。评审专家提出了很好的意见，根据其意见，06年我又把修改稿提交了上去，但我不认同评审专家第二次评审的某些观点，事情又多，便把稿件撤了回来。

不过这位评审专家的意见对我很有启发，他的那些意见都反映到我的学生的论文里去了。

今年初我重新全面修改这篇文章，3月份投稿，上个月收到评审意见，又根据评审意见逐条修改，提交后便收到通知，文章已录用，发往编辑部进入编辑程序了。

这里我感觉有一条值得提一下。投稿时被要求提供3位评审专家名单。以前国内的同事说，国内杂志你提供的评审专家名单其实是让杂志编辑避开这些专家。我不知道国内是否如此。

我这篇文章第一次投稿时没有写这个名单其实是很吃亏的。这次聪明了，一位是该领域的知名专家，我的文章对他评价较高，但成果比他的又进了一步；一位是我的熟人，中国专家；还有一位是另一学术领域的知名专家。收到的是一份评审意见，我猜应该是第一位专家写的。

这次评审，专家提出了4条，我根据专家意见的修改如下，显然，编辑部或评审专家是满意的。

1. According to the comment (1) of the reviewer, a paragraph about the further development of the present method for structural synthesis problems is added as follows:
The present research results indicate that the genetic algorithm would also be suitable for complex process designs. Since the genetic algorithm dose not use the gradient information of the objective function, the mathematical model for process design can be built in a more practical manner. In the present research, the attention was focused on finding the relations between the process inputs and process outputs which have usually well developed by process designers and researchers. In this way the number of decision variables to be optimized could be greatly reduced and might be only the real design/operation parameters. Although the calculation for the process outputs would demand more computing time, the reduction in decision variables could increase the possibility of finding the global optimum more significantly. With this ideal the present method could also be extended for various structural synthesis problems combined with further developments in structural crossover and structural mutation.

2. A sentence is added after Eq. (10):
in which the superscript “*” denotes the parameters which should be modified.

3. According to the comment (2) of the reviewer, the sentence before Eq. (17) is modified as:
Therefore, the classical Newton search method was used in the algorithm to modify the genes of an individual,

4. According to the comment (3) of the reviewer, the following figure captions are modified:
Fig. 2. Gene arrangements in a chromosome (i: stage; j: hot process stream; k: cold process stream).
Fig. 4. The same heat exchanger network with different representations (Taken from Linnhoff & Ahmad, 1990, Fig. 19(a), revised total annual cost: 2,992,495$/yr. Data with brackets: heat capacity flow rate, kW/K; data without brackets: heat duty (above/below the equipment), kW, or stream temperature (above/below the line), °C).
Fig. 13. Optimal heat exchanger network configurations of Example 2 (Total annual cost: 571,698$/yr. Data with brackets: heat capacity flow rate, kW/K; data without brackets: heat duty (above/below the equipment), kW, or stream temperature (above/below the line), K).
Fig. 14. Optimal heat exchanger network configurations of Example 3 (Data with brackets: heat capacity flow rate, kW/K; Data without brackets: heat duty (above/below the equipment), kW, or stream temperature (above/below the line), °C).
(a) 14 units, 2,922,298$/yr.
(b) 12 units, 2,924,910$/yr.
Fig. 16. Optimal heat exchanger network configurations of Example 4 (Total annual cost: 1,753,271$/yr. Data with brackets: heat capacity flow rate, kW/K; data without brackets: heat duty (above/below the equipment), kW, or stream temperature (above/below the line), K).

5. The calculated data of Example 3 have been modified a little which yields a more accurate total annual costs, but the configurations remain unchanged.

6. Error mentioned in the comment (4) of the reviewer has been corrected.

7. Error in Acknowledgments is corrected:
The present research project was supported by the Innovation Program of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (No. XXXXXX).

8. Errors in Table 3 are corrected:
Annual cost of hot utility per unit duty ($/kWyr) = 140
Annual cost of cold utility per unit duty ($/kWyr) = 10
U = 1kW/m2K for all matches.

9. Error in Table 4 is corrected:
Annual cost of cold utility per unit duty ($/kWyr) = 6

Small changes of some words and phrases are not mentioned in the above list.

------------

还有一条，我一直要学生注意的：如果连形式也搞不好，那么内容就更不值得看了（此话来自于本论坛的一位老会员对关于内容和形式的讨论的一个回帖），我投Computers and Chemical Engineering，稿件就严格按那本杂志的格式写，我想，至少编辑看了心里舒服。

944f4fe875fb39d

这是文章中的一张让我十分满意的表格。顺便做个广告，就业形势不好就考研，看了这张表你还不动心吗？

944f4fe875fb39d

例3的附图。

谁要是能提出比这更好的设计，奖励将滚滚而来。

lucy2008

祝贺一下bookish老师。
据我所知，国外一部分杂志是允许投稿人指名道姓不希望某人评审的。

littlekid

恭喜bookish兄，但这表我愣是没看明白啊

chaque

投资确实不小啊！

In the present research, the attention was focused on finding the relations between the process inputs and process outputs which have usually well developed by process designers and researchers.

这句话的从句是否还写作“which have usually been well developed by...”更好一些？

svmxfs

祝贺您！
看你的表格和内容 我确实不太懂，就不敢随便发表意见了！不过真的发国外的搞档次文章需要注意的地方良多，认真，用心，内容，格式，都马虎不得！

0@_@0

祝贺bookish老师，理工科的东西只有千瓦和牛顿似曾相识了

lvyuwen

祝贺，可惜看不懂

大野叟

这是个什么？蝌蚪文看不懂，图也弄不明白

944f4fe875fb39d

换热器网络综合是过程工程中能量回收利用系统的设计的重要环节，其任务就是：设计一个换热器网络，用过程中的需要被冷却的热物流来加热冷物流，使得过程工程中的热能消耗尽可能少，而设备费用的增加又不太多。其目标函数是每年的能耗费用和设备费用之和达到最小值。

由于它是一个混合整数非线性数学规划问题，并且可能的换热器组合的方案个数常常是个天文数字，因此求解十分困难。目前根本无法证明所得到的解是否是全局最优解。

例3是一个换热器网络综合的经典算例。从表中我们可以看到，换热器网络综合的窄点法的提出者，英国的Linnhoff教授1990年就提出了这个算例，他们提出了两个解。XX Zhu在Linnhoff那里工作过，也是这一领域的有点名气的专家。他在95年提出了更好的解，98年，Lewin又改进了这个问题的解。从1990年提出这个问题到现在，18年之后，我用我的算法得到了迄今为止最好的解。

我用的算法是混合遗传算法。

最近，我们还提出了单性遗传算法，用来解决大规模换热器网络的最优化设计。

944f4fe875fb39d

手稿已经可以从网上下载了：http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2008.12.003

（需要SD权限）

不久就应该收到校样，在送出校对稿之前，欢迎提出修改意见，凡被采纳的意见都有至少5分致谢。

944f4fe875fb39d

“那个下载好像是要ID和密码的
By：醉乡常客”

对于本论坛的会员，这应该只是小菜一碟呀。

reader

偶很关心稿费多少money 呵呵

73lixin

恭喜，恭喜，不知道专家给您改的时候是不是peer to peer

lucy2008

peer to peer ，好像一般都是这样的。等待bookish老师答复。

muntzer

换热网络的综合问题，是很困难的领域，人们经常感叹：“业内”的人不会搞这个，会搞这个的人偏又不干这个。

bookish老师的学术造诣，在“过程工程”（过去叫作“化学工程”）领域会大有作为了。

xianlongzaitian

祝贺bookish老师，看不懂啊，除了祝贺还是祝贺

54242541

十分羡慕恭喜你了

xuhaiqing

恭喜，希望能有多点原创