|
|
[align=justify]Dear Editor,
I would like to submit the enclosed manuscript entitled “******” which I wish to be considered for publication in the 《*****************》. I think it is one of very important papers for relativistic quantum mechanics.
In 1985, I discovered an important principle that can be used to checkout all mistakes hidden in physical science (the principle has been rejected by some scientific journals), and I have used the principle to check the solutions of some wave equations. Because of requirement of the mathematics, I strictly proved nearly 100 new mathematical theorems. In 2000, I published a paper (Reference 48) implying that some theoretical physicists have begun to err in mathematical methods and calculations from then on solving classical wave equations. Once a wave equation with the certain boundary condition or initial value condition is introduced, all remnant physics should be essentially mathematics. At least, one cannot disobey the mathematical principle when he solved the wave equation. I cannot understand why some theoretical physicists did not investigate the rigorous deduction of mathematics, but given those amphibolous explanations to the some incorrect deductions, such as the divergent wave function and imaginary number of energies. Relativistic quantum mechanics concealed more mathematical mistakes in principle. For example, the exact solutions of the Dirac equation in various cases clearly violate the existence and uniqueness of the solution of the differential equation. Only one demonstrate some new theorems for finding the eigensolutions sets of some differential equations with the variable coefficient can find the correct eigenvalues set of the corresponding wave equations.
I wish that this paper will be published in your journal 《*****************》. The logic of the paper is precise, and it implies that one should search the correct mathematical methods for solving the Driac equation with Coulomb potential and naturally eliminating the divergence and imaginary energies, especially to seek the exacter wave equation, it actually exists.
I am absolutely right in this paper. However I don’t know why those journals cannot accept it. For 20 years, I have silently investigated mathematics and theoretical physics. What I do only stick by the science, but not for any personal honor and advantage behalf.
Thank you very much.
Sincerely yours,
******
|
|
发表于 2008-3-4 16:30:35
发表于 2008-3-15 13:08:52
