|
发表于 2006-1-16 15:36:10
|
显示全部楼层
引用第16楼lesenhower于2006-01-15 20:59发表的“”:
my dear friend,we are talking about "higher education", not "education"
of course "education" should be public and that's the case for the 9-year "compulsory education". but "high education" is not for every one, not even for the majority. something scarce is something precious. there can never be a quantity of "leaders" in the society, likely, only a minority could be called "elites". if "higher education" were available for most people ,then it was no longer "higher education", it became a new kind of "compulsory education"
My education is the very " higer education".Why some people made a mistake that higer education must be allowed for not the majority.My idea is that the elargement gives everyone chances.And who can succeed depends on his hard-working and some other factors.I think our higher education is a little diffrent from some westen higer education.Not only the name but also the essential.Maybe westen students can learn much more usefull things spending their 9or 12years.But in china you can't.In China,20years ago ,our population was also small.Now we also have probelm of the number. So the development is reasonable. |
|