ignatius 发表于 2006-5-12 00:13:01

[Cambridge] Literal Meaning by François Recanati

Please SHARE!!!!!

http://assets.cambridge.org/052153/7363/cover/0521537363.jpg

Literal Meaning
by Fran鏾is Recanati

info at cambridge.org
http://www.cambridge.org/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=051106098X


According to the dominant position among philosophers of language today, we can legitimately ascribe determinate contents (such as truth-conditions) to natural language sentences, independently of what the speaker actually means. This view contrasts with that held by ordinary language philosophers fifty years ago: according to them, speech acts, not sentences, are the primary bearers of content. Fran鏾is Recanati argues for the relevance of this controversy to the current debate about semantics and pragmatics. Is 'what is said' (as opposed to merely implied) determined by linguistic conventions, or is it an aspect of 'speaker's meaning'? Do we need pragmatics to fix truth-conditions? What is 'literal meaning'? To what extent is semantic composition a creative process? How pervasive is context-sensitivity? Recanati provides an original and insightful defence of 'contextualism', and offers an informed survey of the spectrum of positions held by linguists and philosophers working at the semantics/pragmatics interface.


• Addresses issues which are of interest to a wide audience
• Defends a bold and provocative thesis that will elicit debate
• Written in clear and accessible language and presupposes no prior knowledge

Contents

List of figures; Acknowledgments; Introduction; 1. Two approaches to ‘what is said’; 2. Primary pragmatic processes; 3. Relevance-theoretic objections; 4. The syncretic view; 5. Nonliteral uses; 6. From literalism to contextualism; 7. Indexicalism and the finding fallacy; 8. Circumstances of evaluation; 9. Contextualism: How far can we go?; 10. Conclusion.

\"Literal Meaning\" reviewed by Jason Stanley, Rutgers University
http://ndpr.nd.edu/review.cfm?id=3841

gidiok 发表于 2006-5-12 00:22:41

Thank you. You always have good books.

lala 发表于 2006-5-12 08:48:55

Re:[Cambridge] Literal Meaning by François Recanati

Thank You!

zhoukaijian 发表于 2006-5-12 10:27:18

Re:[Cambridge] Literal Meaning by François Recanati

好像下不了，感谢提供了这么多好书

ignatius 发表于 2006-5-12 21:39:45

Thank You People,
The books I get are mainly about philosophy
Thanks for the support

whiteman 发表于 2006-5-12 22:14:28

Re:[Cambridge] Literal Meaning by François Recanati

Contents of this book:

1 Two approaches to ‘what is said’
2 Primary pragmatic processes
3 Relevance-theoretic objections
4 The Syncretic View
5 Non-literal uses
6 From Literalism to Contextualism
7 Indexicalism and the Binding Fallacy
8 Circumstances of evaluation
9 Contextualism: how far can we go?
页: [1]
查看完整版本: [Cambridge] Literal Meaning by François Recanati